On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 1:26 PM, Frank Groeneveld < frank+openbsd-po...@frankgroeneveld.nl> wrote:
> On 11/04/15 22:34, Stuart Henderson wrote: > >> Done. (I also added a blank line before the COMMENT). >> > > Thank you! > > Seems pretty common for Qt things unfortunately. phantomjs needs a >> patched Qt too, calibre uses private interfaces so it needs a :patch >> target to find the headers... >> > > Yes, I saw the phanomjs port indeed. I've built wkhtmltopdf with it's > statically linked, patched QT and needed a few patches from the phantomjs > port to get it going. It seems however, phantomjs is always statically > build against the patched qt. > > I wonder how much time it would add to builds, it loses a lot of >> features without the patched Qt (and I have somewhere I might >> want to use that too). >> > > On my computer the current port builds within minutes, while the build > with patched QT takes around one hour. > > I'll try to make a port for it, I got it building a few weeks ago: > https://github.com/wkhtmltopdf/wkhtmltopdf/issues/1991 > > I asked the upstream author privately, and he said that if you prefer the stock qt4 or the "unpatched" as he calls it, you can switch as well to the qt5 in ports. Thanks
