On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 06:33:56PM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote: > Joerg Jung wrote: > > So this is not only needed by dwm but all suckless ports and leads to a > > suckless bsd.port.mk module. > > Now we're going a bit far afield. For today, I'm ok with the update as is, > with the man page bits.
Ok, I committed it as is for now. All other discussed non-trivial changes might be tackled later. Need to think about this for a while, maybe someone else comes up with something meanwhile. > I do like the consistency our port offers, I kept this consistency for now, old habbits... yalla yalla :) > vs reflecting whatever the whim of > the day is for upstream. If anything, having a patch in patches made it easier > for me to change the font, since I can just edit the patch instead of trying > to generate a new one. This argument does not count, as you see only half of the config options (the ones which we adjusted from vanilla). > I'll note that anybody who does wish to override the terminal can easily put a > symlink in ~/bin/uxterm that points anywhere they like.
