Il 1 dicembre 2016 14:04:30 CET, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas <j...@wxcvbn.org> ha scritto: >Jiri B <ji...@devio.us> writes: > >>> lsof is a problem. It is tightly coupled to the base system, enough >to >>> require /usr/src/sys checked out to be able to build it. This means >>> that it breaks quite frequently: >> >> Correcting Pascal's mail... >> >> IMO lsof is used because BSD' netstat >> doesn't show PID of a process with open sockets. fstat could be >> used with little filter effort. > >net/arm could indeed be easily patched to use fstat output, sthen@ >proposed an initial patch for this: > > http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=147445148420200&w=2 > >More code is needed to completely replace the lsof bits. Someone who's >interested in tor / arm could take a look at this. > >However this is unrelated to whether we should keep lsof or not. >Testing shows that currently net/arm works *because* it can't use lsof.
lsof has always caused troubles in the past, and it doesn't work well. Imho it's time to kill it. Ciao, David
