On 2017/06/25 00:10, Jakub Skrzypnik wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Jun 2017 10:17:37 +0100
> Stuart Henderson <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > The web page for them says "I do not claim any rights to the original
> > raster fonts on which this work is based", and "They are exact
> > duplicates of the original pixel fonts", and "The extra characters
> > were taken from international versions of the original hardware (if
> > available)".
> > 
> > It seems a bit of a stretch for someone who has converted them to
> > TTF to claim full copyright on them. Undoubtedly they have done a lot
> > of work sourcing, converting and designing missing international
> > characters, but it all feels like a derived work which would still
> > be subject to the original copyright which presumably would be owned
> > by companies like IBM and ATI.
> > 
> > None of this prevents them from going to ports with appropriate
> > PERMIT_* settings...
> 
> I'm not interested in the whole copyright stuff behind the author's
> side. He ripped these fonts, converted them and sometimes even redrawn
> them completely (adding Unicode pages, for example). There's no point
> in disccusing "that was based on some IBM PS/2 9000 Plus ROM font
> manufactured 35 years ago! It's copyrighted!".
> 
> No, it isn't. I'm not distributing ROM images of character generator
> from these machines and nobody should do. That's was an author's
> problem to obtain them, and we're discussing the final product, which
> is in fact licensed on CC-BY-SA license. So, IMHO it should retain its
> PERMIT_PACKAGE_CDROM variable as is.

That is ridiculous. You can't steal someone's copyrighted artwork and
get around the law by repackaging and distributing it in a different
format.

Also it isn't about *you* distributing it, it's about OpenBSD distributing
it.

Reply via email to