On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 09:26:22PM +0100, Björn Ketelaars wrote: > On Tue 13/02/2018 20:59, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 07:24:58PM +0000, Björn Ketelaars wrote: > > > On Tue 13/02/2018 20:01, Landry Breuil wrote: > > > > On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 06:37:47PM +0100, Björn Ketelaars wrote: > > > > > Diff below brings potamus to the latest version. While here add > > > > > SEPARATE_BUILD=Yes to Makefile. > > > > > > > > What is it with this ? I see you're adding it to Makefiles, is there a > > > > particular reason for it ? If it's *better* generally, then maybe a > > > > (much larger) task would be to switch it by default and only set it to > > > > no for broken ports.. > > > > > > It has some advantages, and testing it while working on a port is cheap. > > > From https://www.openbsd.org/faq/ports/guide.html: > > > > > > - If the port can build with object files outside its source tree, this > > > is cleaner (many programs using CONFIGURE_STYLE=gnu can), and may help > > > people who mount their ports tree on several arches. > > > > You still can. Just use a local partition for your objdir. > > > > > - This can also spare you some effort, as you will possibly be able to > > > restart the cycle at configure most of the time. > > > > I agree with Landry. > > I don't like to start adding this to ports unless this is required. Now, if > > we > > want to make it a default, than fine, someone starts the effort... > > Clear! Until I understand the internals better I'm not going to start > the effort. > > Attached a new diff without the SEPARATE_BUILD bit. > > OK?
ok
