On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 02:18:27PM +0000, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> << removed [email protected] from CC's, how did that get there?! >>
> 
> On 2018/03/08 15:10, Solène Rapenne wrote:
> > Le 2018-03-07 23:03, Josh Elsasser a écrit :
> > > Builds and passes tests on amd64 and i386, builds on macppc and test
> > > results don't look much worse. Any sbcl users care to give the update
> > > a try?
> > > 
> > > diff -ruN ./Makefile ../../mystuff/lang/sbcl/Makefile
> > > --- ./Makefile    Tue Jan 23 08:15:57 2018
> > > +++ ../../mystuff/lang/sbcl/Makefile      Wed Mar  7 11:32:54 2018
> > 
> > Hello,
> > 
> > Your diff has wrong paths, it doesn't apply correctly with patch.
> 
> patch's default auto-detection of paths isn't great, I normally set -Ep0
> (or 1 or whatever, depending on how many path components need stripping)
> which works with this.

Oops, noted. I guess I have a mystuff/lang/sbcl directory everywhere
so didn't notice.

> > I tested your diff neverthless, sbcl works fine on amd64, I'm able to
> > compile and use x11/stumpwm. I used a few lisp programs with the
> > new version and I had no issue so far. I tried the -threads flavor
> > which compiled fine, maybe it will fix the issue added in comments
> > in the Makefile that the thread flavor crash from time to time
> > at the build stage. The -threads flavors also let compiling stumpwm
> > and some other common lisp code.
> 
> ok with me (not that I'm an sbcl user ..), shall I go ahead and commit
> that Josh?

Yes, thank you.

Reply via email to