On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 06:51:11PM -0400, Brian Callahan wrote:

> Should GnuCOBOL autoupgrade OpenCOBOL users, like I just did with osh =>
> etsh? Feels like it should, no?

Absolutely, that was the plan all along :)

> It feels like there's a patch missing, so we can set the OSTYPE variable.
> And you accidentally removed the -O2 -pipe from CFLAGS, so I added them back
> :) (as well as the ability for the user to set CPPFLAGS and LDFLAGS too)

Good catch, thanks for the tweaks.

> Attached is a tarball with all of this. I think this is ok alongside the
> right quirks bits.

Quirks bits below. OK to import and remove open-cobol?

Index: Makefile
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/ports/devel/quirks/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.586
diff -u -p -r1.586 Makefile
--- Makefile    24 Apr 2018 13:24:47 -0000      1.586
+++ Makefile    24 Apr 2018 16:11:26 -0000
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ CATEGORIES =    devel databases
 DISTFILES =
 
 # API.rev
-PKGNAME =      quirks-2.430
+PKGNAME =      quirks-2.431
 PKG_ARCH =     *
 MAINTAINER =   Marc Espie <es...@openbsd.org>
 
Index: files/Quirks.pm
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/ports/devel/quirks/files/Quirks.pm,v
retrieving revision 1.599
diff -u -p -r1.599 Quirks.pm
--- files/Quirks.pm     24 Apr 2018 13:24:47 -0000      1.599
+++ files/Quirks.pm     24 Apr 2018 16:11:26 -0000
@@ -506,6 +506,7 @@ my $stem_extensions = {
        'latexila' => 'gnome-latex',
        'osh' => 'etsh',
        'gnome-themes-standard' => 'gnome-themes-extra',
+       'open-cobol' => 'gnucobol',
 };
 
 my $obsolete_reason = {

Reply via email to