On Tue, May 08 2018, Klemens Nanni <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 12:39:12PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
[...] >> By making it very clear what are dropping, you make it vague *what remains*. > Yes, that's the (obvious) trade-off I made. > >> And *what remains* is the meat of the matter, because that's the kernel >> featureset the program may play again. > > So here's a diff for pledging isync the same way as before but without > drop_promises. Maybe uglier, but easier to understand. The changes look fine. ok jca@ -- jca | PGP : 0x1524E7EE / 5135 92C1 AD36 5293 2BDF DDCC 0DFA 74AE 1524 E7EE
