Is not a problem, but lots of packages allready build py-package, py3-package and if the default policy is to split the docs you will have also py-package-docs. Pro: - Less size of the port when you dont need the documentation, if you add to the number py-packages required for several packages this would be pretty good! Con: - 3 packages instead of 2. - A little more complexity in the Makefile to make docs only for one flavor.
In my opinion, packaging docs for this small ports is a waste of space, time, effort and bandwidth. They all have docs online... But you are Marc Espie, I remember your name since I was a teenager! so you tell me how you want this done. (Is no joke, :D ) In a previous conversation with Stuart Henderson he said that there was no need to split if the "files aren't large", in this case I would consider them medium size... https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=152724757229146 Cheers. Elias. 2018-06-11 3:46 GMT-03:00 Marc Espie <[email protected]>: > On Sun, Jun 10, 2018 at 08:50:53PM -0300, Elias M. Mariani wrote: >> py-sqlalchemy and py3-sqlalchemy (python3 flavor) have conflicts with >> the documentation. >> The diff attached makes a different folder for py3, best solution I >> guess without making a docs package. >> >> Now the versions can coexist... >> >> Cheers. >> Elias > > > Why not make a doc subpackage ? > We got the tools, and that's pretty easy to do.
