On June 21, 2018 5:17 PM, Christopher Zimmermann <chr...@openbsd.org> wrote:
> > > Hi, > > the last few days I prepared an update of ocaml to 4.06 and opam to > > 2.00rc2 and along with it updates or REVISION bumps of the dependent > > ports. > > I tested dpb builds on amd64 with and without native code support > > enabled. I could not test on other archs. > > The ports affected are: > > devel/cil > > devel/coccinelle > > devel/cudf > > devel/frama-c > > devel/ocaml-cmdliner > > devel/ocaml-cppo > > devel/ocaml-dose > > devel/ocaml-extlib > > devel/ocaml-graph > > devel/ocaml-jsonm > > devel/ocaml-menhir > > devel/ocaml-ocamlbuild > > devel/ocaml-parmap > > devel/ocaml-pcre > > devel/ocaml-re > > devel/ocaml-uutf > > devel/omake > > devel/ounit > > graphics/pdfsandwich > > lang/obc > > lang/ocaml > > lang/ocaml-camlp4 > > lang/ocaml-camlp5 > > math/coq > > net/mldonkey > > net/unison/2.4x > > net/unison/2.5x > > sysutils/findlib > > sysutils/opam > > textproc/bibtex2html > > textproc/hevea > > x11/lablgtk2 > > two ports have been added since num has been removed from the OCaml > > distribution. > > math/ocaml-num > > math/Zarith > > I'd like to collect some OKs from developers familiar with OCaml ports. > > If someone owning a powerpc or sparc machine feels like it he could try > > to enable OCaml native-code > > in /usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/arch-defines.mk for his arch and test > > whether it is working again. > > The diff is attached as ocaml.diff.gz. > > Christopher > Thank you, I will be testing this tomorrow
