On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 10:21:18PM +0200, Landry Breuil wrote: > I dont think multipackaging is *necessary*, it might just be convenient > for ppl that want to just run the server, without having all the > dependencies the client has. It would also split the dependencies, but i > dont know if it is worth the effort. > > But converting a port to multipackages requires some knowledge of the > portstree :) >
I failed with testing, I need to understand multipackaging better, let's hope server won't depend on client thanks to missing items in PLIST. Also making minetest_game a separate package will get rid of redundancy downloading game data when Minetest's port gets REVISION'd. Speaking about server dependencies: Extra: GL.17 GLU.9 ICE.10 Irrlicht.3 SM.9 X11.16 Xext.13 Xxf86vm.6 Extra: bz2.10 freetype.29 jpeg.68 ogg.6 openal.3 png.17 vorbis.9 Extra: vorbisfile.6
