On Tue, Jul 10 2018, Mark Kettenis <[email protected]> wrote:
> Here is a cleaned-up version of a diff that Dale made to support
> OpenBSD/arm64 in gdb. Single-stepping doesn't work yet, which means
> that stepping through the code doesn't really work. But setting
> breakpoints and inspecting state or looking at core files should work.
>
> I'm not sure what to do with the lang/ocaml comment in the Makefile.
Please give this diff a try.
Index: lang/ocaml/Makefile
===================================================================
RCS file: /d/cvs/ports/lang/ocaml/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.79
diff -u -p -r1.79 Makefile
--- lang/ocaml/Makefile 15 Sep 2017 09:23:12 -0000 1.79
+++ lang/ocaml/Makefile 10 Jul 2018 10:21:47 -0000
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ COMMENT-graphics = OCaml Graphics librar
# Do check that the ports that depend on it still work, or repair them.
# Don't forget to bump version in ocaml.port.mk, too!
VERSION= 4.03.0
-REVISION= 2
+REVISION= 3
PKGNAME-main = ocaml-${VERSION}
PKGNAME-graphics = ocaml-graphics-${VERSION}
@@ -45,11 +45,9 @@ RUN_DEPENDS-graphics += lang/ocaml
WANTLIB-main = c curses m pthread
WANTLIB-graphics = X11
-.if ${MACHINE_ARCH} != aarch64
-# for libbfd; devel/gdb doesn't build on aarch64 yet.
+# for libbfd
BUILD_DEPENDS += devel/gdb
WANTLIB-main += iberty z
-.endif
.include <bsd.port.arch.mk>
> ok?
Your diff only adds arm64 stuff and doesn't modify architectures that
already work, so it should be pretty safe and afaik you don't even need
the REVISION bump. No arm64 hw to test with but ok jca@ anyway
--
jca | PGP : 0x1524E7EE / 5135 92C1 AD36 5293 2BDF DDCC 0DFA 74AE 1524 E7EE
