> From: Jeremie Courreges-Anglas <[email protected]>
> Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2018 12:23:30 +0200
>
> On Tue, Jul 10 2018, Mark Kettenis <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Here is a cleaned-up version of a diff that Dale made to support
> > OpenBSD/arm64 in gdb. Single-stepping doesn't work yet, which means
> > that stepping through the code doesn't really work. But setting
> > breakpoints and inspecting state or looking at core files should work.
> >
> > I'm not sure what to do with the lang/ocaml comment in the Makefile.
>
> Please give this diff a try.
Builds. Dun't know how to tell if it actually works ;).
> Index: lang/ocaml/Makefile
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /d/cvs/ports/lang/ocaml/Makefile,v
> retrieving revision 1.79
> diff -u -p -r1.79 Makefile
> --- lang/ocaml/Makefile 15 Sep 2017 09:23:12 -0000 1.79
> +++ lang/ocaml/Makefile 10 Jul 2018 10:21:47 -0000
> @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ COMMENT-graphics = OCaml Graphics librar
> # Do check that the ports that depend on it still work, or repair them.
> # Don't forget to bump version in ocaml.port.mk, too!
> VERSION= 4.03.0
> -REVISION= 2
> +REVISION= 3
>
> PKGNAME-main = ocaml-${VERSION}
> PKGNAME-graphics = ocaml-graphics-${VERSION}
> @@ -45,11 +45,9 @@ RUN_DEPENDS-graphics += lang/ocaml
> WANTLIB-main = c curses m pthread
> WANTLIB-graphics = X11
>
> -.if ${MACHINE_ARCH} != aarch64
> -# for libbfd; devel/gdb doesn't build on aarch64 yet.
> +# for libbfd
> BUILD_DEPENDS += devel/gdb
> WANTLIB-main += iberty z
> -.endif
>
> .include <bsd.port.arch.mk>
>
>
>
> > ok?
>
> Your diff only adds arm64 stuff and doesn't modify architectures that
> already work, so it should be pretty safe and afaik you don't even need
> the REVISION bump. No arm64 hw to test with but ok jca@ anyway
>
> --
> jca | PGP : 0x1524E7EE / 5135 92C1 AD36 5293 2BDF DDCC 0DFA 74AE 1524 E7EE
>
