>> Hi Stuart and Kristaps, >> >> Stuart Henderson wrote on Wed, Aug 01, 2018 at 07:57:25PM +0100: >> >>> I'd never expect to find this in multimedia... misc seems >>> perfect? >> >> I don't object to misc either and trust Stuart's judgement on this >> one. >> >> But i think libdivecomputer should have the same main category as >> subsurface, keeping all the diving ports close together. No >> objection to keeping them all in misc. I understand that even >> though it installs a shared library (which is not yet used by any >> other port), libdivecomputer can also be used standalone via the >> dctool(1) command line program included in the libdivecomputer >> port. > > I very much agree.
Enclosed are both subsurface.tgz and libdivecomputer.tgz, which have the noted change. (Both are now in misc.) Both tested on amd64. (I do have a utility that uses libdivecomputer and will submit it soon.) Thank you!
libdivecomputer.tgz
Description: Binary data
subsurface.tgz
Description: Binary data
