Hi ports, Can somebody look at these 2 please?
- p5-POE-Component-Resolver https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=154092768107481&w=2 - p5-POE-Component-Syndicator https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=154101419130335&w=2 Thanks in advance! Charlène. On Sun, 11 Nov 2018 16:55:48 -0700 Andrew Hewus Fresh wrote: > I'll commit all of these with a second OK on importing > p5-POE-Component-Resolver and p5-POE-Component-Syndicator > > On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 08:26:09PM +0100, Charlene Wendling wrote: > > Hi ports, > > > > ----- > > Intro: > > > > This is the second round of the big POE update. I'll submit them in > > dependency order. > > > > The whole thing builds and installs with dpb on amd64 and i386, and > > the few consumers i've found run fine. > > ----- > > > > I'm proposing here an update for p5-POE itself. > > OK afresh1@ > reverse dependency tests seem to be the same as with the old version. > > > On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 08:26:59PM +0100, Charlene Wendling wrote: > > > > I'm proposing here POE::Component::Resolver. It will be needed for > > updating net/p5-POE-Component-Client-HTTP. > > OK afresh1@ > Looks fine to me, tests pass. > > > > On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 08:27:37PM +0100, Charlene Wendling wrote: > > > > I'm proposing here an update for POE::API::Peek, a module that peeks > > into the internals of a running POE environment. > > OK afresh1@ > The one reverse dependency seems to work with both. > > > > On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 08:28:36PM +0100, Charlene Wendling wrote: > > > > Here is an update for POE::Component::IKC, that allow inter kernels > > communication between POE kernels. > > OK afresh1@ > It doesn't seem that anything in particular depends on this, and the > update looks good. > > > On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 02:07:23PM +0100, Charlene Wendling wrote: > > Hi ports! > > > > Here is a new port for POE::Component::Syndicator. It will be needed > > for updating net/p5-POE-Component-IRC. > > OK afresh1@ > Looks good to me. > > > On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 02:07:42PM +0100, Charlene Wendling wrote: > > > > Here is an update for POE::Loop::Event. > > OK afresh1@ > It doesn't seem that anything in particular depends on this, and the > update looks good. > > > On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 02:08:10PM +0100, Charlene Wendling wrote: > > > > Here is an update for POE::Loop::Tk, a bridge that allows POE to be > > driven by Tk. > > OK afresh1@ > It doesn't seem that anything in particular depends on this, and the > update looks good. Tests didn't actually run as I have apparently > broken X forwarding from my laptop to my ports testing machine. > > > On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 02:08:34PM +0100, Charlene Wendling wrote: > > > > Here is an update for POE::Component::Client::DNS, a DNS module for > > POE. > > OK afresh1@ > reverse dependency tests seem to be the same as with the old version. > >
