I should have time to commit all these if I could get someone to look at
the two new ports and give a second OK before import.

On Sat, Nov 17, 2018 at 11:04:49PM +0100, Charlene Wendling wrote:
> Hi ports, 
> 
> Can somebody look at these 2 please? 
> 
> - p5-POE-Component-Resolver
> https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=154092768107481&w=2
> 
> - p5-POE-Component-Syndicator
> https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=154101419130335&w=2
> 
> Thanks in advance! 
> 
> Charlène. 
> 
> 
> On Sun, 11 Nov 2018 16:55:48 -0700
> Andrew Hewus Fresh wrote:
> 
> > I'll commit all of these with a second OK on importing
> > p5-POE-Component-Resolver and p5-POE-Component-Syndicator
> > 
> > On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 08:26:09PM +0100, Charlene Wendling wrote:
> > > Hi ports, 
> > > 
> > > -----
> > > Intro: 
> > > 
> > > This is the second round of the big POE update. I'll submit them in
> > > dependency order.
> > > 
> > > The whole thing builds and installs with dpb on amd64 and i386, and
> > > the few consumers i've found run fine.
> > > -----
> > > 
> > > I'm proposing here an update for p5-POE itself.
> > 
> > OK afresh1@
> > reverse dependency tests seem to be the same as with the old version.
> > 
> > 
> > On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 08:26:59PM +0100, Charlene Wendling wrote:
> > > 
> > > I'm proposing here POE::Component::Resolver.  It will be needed for
> > > updating net/p5-POE-Component-Client-HTTP. 
> > 
> > OK afresh1@
> > Looks fine to me, tests pass.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 08:27:37PM +0100, Charlene Wendling wrote:
> > > 
> > > I'm proposing here an update for POE::API::Peek, a module that peeks
> > > into the internals of a running POE environment. 
> > 
> > OK afresh1@
> > The one reverse dependency seems to work with both.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 08:28:36PM +0100, Charlene Wendling wrote:
> > > 
> > > Here is an update for POE::Component::IKC, that allow inter kernels
> > > communication between POE kernels. 
> > 
> > OK afresh1@
> > It doesn't seem that anything in particular depends on this, and the
> > update looks good.
> > 
> > 
> > On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 02:07:23PM +0100, Charlene Wendling wrote:
> > > Hi ports! 
> > > 
> > > Here is a new port for POE::Component::Syndicator. It will be needed
> > > for updating net/p5-POE-Component-IRC.
> > 
> > OK afresh1@
> > Looks good to me.
> > 
> > 
> > On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 02:07:42PM +0100, Charlene Wendling wrote:
> > > 
> > > Here is an update for POE::Loop::Event. 
> > 
> > OK afresh1@
> > It doesn't seem that anything in particular depends on this, and the
> > update looks good.
> > 
> > 
> > On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 02:08:10PM +0100, Charlene Wendling wrote:
> > > 
> > > Here is an update for POE::Loop::Tk, a bridge that allows POE to be
> > > driven by Tk. 
> > 
> > OK afresh1@
> > It doesn't seem that anything in particular depends on this, and the
> > update looks good.  Tests didn't actually run as I have apparently
> > broken X forwarding from my laptop to my ports testing machine.
> > 
> > 
> > On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 02:08:34PM +0100, Charlene Wendling wrote:
> > > 
> > > Here is an update for POE::Component::Client::DNS, a DNS module for
> > > POE.
> >  
> > OK afresh1@
> > reverse dependency tests seem to be the same as with the old version.
> > 
> > 
> 

-- 
andrew - http://afresh1.com

Software doesn't do what you want it to do, it does what you tell it do.
                      -- Stefan G. Weichinger.

Reply via email to