Hi, The double comma thing: I thought that was a typo which happened to work, but I'm willing to be proven wrong!
The man path: it was the only way I could get the man page to go into the right place. I'll try again over the next few days in case I screwed up. Cheers! -- Edd Barrett On 27 Dec 2018, 17:38, at 17:38, Landry Breuil <[email protected]> wrote: >On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 05:21:46PM +0000, Edd Barrett wrote: >> Hi everyone, >> >> I hope you are all enjoying the holidays! >> >> On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 12:13:46PM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote: >> > > > editors/texworks >> > > >> > > https://github.com/TeXworks/texworks/releases seem to say that >qt5 is >> > > supported >> > >> > Our version is from 2012, and qt5 is the default since 0.6 per >> > >https://raw.githubusercontent.com/TeXworks/texworks/release-0.6.2/NEWS >- >> > edd@, care to update it ? >> >> Here's an update to TeX Works, now using QT5. It wasn't totally >> straightforward, but I got there in the end. >> >> Notes: >> - Build system switched to cmake. >> - Docs no longer distributed with TeX Works (other than a small man >page). >> - This update will break TeX Live 2018 (not yet committed) due to a >synctex >> API change. I have patches to fix this when the time comes. > >Well i dont use it but it builds & packages fine, and generally looks >good. Im just not 100% sure about the dependency moving from >poppler,,-qt4 to poppler,-qt5 (iirc there's a reason for the ,, - ie >no >flavor ? any flavor ?) > >You set -DTeXworks_MAN_DIR=man in CONFIGURE_ARGS but later patch it out >in patches/patch-src_CMakeLists_txt, is that intended ? > >other than that, if it works for you, okay. > >Landry
