On Thu, May 24 2018, "Elias M. Mariani" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > I was looking for Editra (text editor) and I found that there is not > port of Editra by itself, It is contained within the py-wxPython port. > https://github.com/openbsd/ports/blob/439514e8c82c269624be233d533b016d3a63a201/x11/py-wxPython/pkg/PLIST > > Shouldn't be better to remove the extras from py-wxPython and having > those apart ? > I mean, if you want wxPython maybe you do not want Editra.
ritchie~$ du -sh /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/wx/tools/Editra /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/wx/tools/XRCed 8.6M /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/wx/tools/Editra 1.3M /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/wx/tools/XRCed ritchie ~$ pkg_info -s py-wxPython Information for inst:py-wxPython-3.0.2.0 Size: 64856495 Gaining 10M may be worth it, but... > And looking for standalone applications inside other ports doesn't > seem right, I might as well thought that there was no port of Editra. making those programs more visible is what matters most IMHO. I would support such a move. However... my tries to update wxPython to the latest 4.x upstream release were painful (we're using the last "classic", 3.0.x release). I'm not sure it's a good idea to make the port more complicated *now*. :) -- jca | PGP : 0x1524E7EE / 5135 92C1 AD36 5293 2BDF DDCC 0DFA 74AE 1524 E7EE
