Hi Jeremie, Yes, I was worried at the time (this thread is from may 2017) for people not no find editra in a "direct" way. At least it happened to me... Now we have devel/spyder witch is a good IDE/editor for python, so the problem is somewhat mitigated. The may not find editra but the will find an editor. :)
But if there is a way to pkg_add editra I think it would be more visible. I leave that to the discretion of the people maintaining such port. Cheers. Elias. On Sun, Jan 13, 2019 at 9:30 PM Jeremie Courreges-Anglas <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, May 24 2018, "Elias M. Mariani" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > I was looking for Editra (text editor) and I found that there is not > > port of Editra by itself, It is contained within the py-wxPython port. > > https://github.com/openbsd/ports/blob/439514e8c82c269624be233d533b016d3a63a201/x11/py-wxPython/pkg/PLIST > > > > Shouldn't be better to remove the extras from py-wxPython and having > > those apart ? > > I mean, if you want wxPython maybe you do not want Editra. > > ritchie~$ du -sh /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/wx/tools/Editra > /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/wx/tools/XRCed > 8.6M /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/wx/tools/Editra > 1.3M /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/wx/tools/XRCed > ritchie ~$ pkg_info -s py-wxPython > Information for inst:py-wxPython-3.0.2.0 > > Size: 64856495 > > Gaining 10M may be worth it, but... > > > And looking for standalone applications inside other ports doesn't > > seem right, I might as well thought that there was no port of Editra. > > making those programs more visible is what matters most IMHO. I would > support such a move. > > However... my tries to update wxPython to the latest 4.x upstream > release were painful (we're using the last "classic", 3.0.x release). > I'm not sure it's a good idea to make the port more complicated *now*. :) > > -- > jca | PGP : 0x1524E7EE / 5135 92C1 AD36 5293 2BDF DDCC 0DFA 74AE 1524 E7EE
