On Wed 10/07/2019 17:34, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote: > On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 01:53:49PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > On 2019/07/10 13:52, Björn Ketelaars wrote: > > > Please find enclosed a port for xxhash. > > > > > > DESCR: > > > xxHash is an extremely fast non-cryptographic hash algorithm, running at > > > RAM speed limits. Code is highly portable, and hashes are identical on > > > all platforms (little / big endian). > > > > "non-cryptographic hash algorithm", security/ feels wrong, though > > I'm not sure what is better .. > > sysutils? > > BTW, looks good to me. > > > > > > I disabled a test for now as it irreproducible errors out, and I'm > > > unable to fix it. Run tested in combination with HEAD of borgbackup. > > > > it's better if failing tests are visible so I wouldn't disable it. > > (Though that test seems to pass reliably for me anyway..) > > >
An update, which does not disable a sometimes failing test (at least for me). Thinking about it I agree with sthen@ that CATEGORIES=security 'feels wrong'. Suggestion from juanfra@ to put it in sysutils/ is something that could be explained. New port enclosed. OK?
xxhash.tgz
Description: application/tar-gz
