On 3/1/25 3:34 PM, Wietse Venema via Postfix-devel wrote: > Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-devel: >> This looks like a clear violation of >> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2554#section-4 >> >> Should we really unconditionally ignore protocol violations that might >> indicate that the client and server are out of sync??? >> >> I'm inclined to suggest that at most this should be an off by default >> work-around. And a bug should be opened with Microsoft. > > I agree that Postfix should not unconditionally ignore server > response errrors. This requires a more targeted aproach. > > How about this: > > main.cf: > # Some Microsoft servers violate RFC 2554 section 4. > smtp_reply_filter = pcre:{{/^334\s+GSSAPI\s+supported/ 334}} > > For a description of inline PCRE table syntax, see > https://www.postfix.org/pcre_table.5.html#inline_specification > > Patches? Patches? We don't need no steenkeeng patches. > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VqomZQMZQCQ
Would it make sense to have this in either the default config, or as a commented-out option? That way mail admins will know what is going on and have an easy way to fix it. -- Sincerely, Demi Marie Obenour (she/her/hers) _______________________________________________ Postfix-devel mailing list -- postfix-devel@postfix.org To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-devel-le...@postfix.org
