postfix-devel  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: RFC: Verify concurrency limit Wietse Venema
  • Re: RFC: Verify concurrency limit Mika Ilmaranta
  • Re: RFC: Verify concurrency limit Wietse Venema
  • Re: RFC: Verify concurrency limit Mika Ilmaranta
  • Re: RFC: Verify concurrency limit Wietse Venema
  • Re: RFC: Verify concurrency limit Wietse Venema
  • Re: RFC: Verify concurrency limit Patrik Rak
  • Re: RFC: Verify concurrency limit Wietse Venema
  • PATCH: Verify concurrency limit Wietse Venema
  • Re: PATCH: Verify concurrency limit Wietse Venema
  • Re: PATCH: Verify concurrency limit Wietse Venema
  • Re: PATCH: Verify concurrency limit Wietse Venema
  • Re: RFC: Verify concurrency limit Mika Ilmaranta
  • Re: RFC: Verify concurrency limit Wietse Venema
  • Re: RFC: Verify concurrency limit Kim B. Heino
  • Re: RFC: Verify concurrency limit Kim B. Heino
  • Re: RFC: Verify concurrency limit Wietse Venema
• Ambiguous description on "reject_unknown_recipient_domain" King Cao
  • Re: Ambiguous description on "reject_unknown_recipient_domain" Viktor Dukhovni
  • Re: Ambiguous description on "reject_unknown_recipient_domain" Noel Jones
  • Re: Ambiguous description on "reject_unknown_recipient_domain" Wietse Venema
  • Re: Ambiguous description on "reject_unknown_recipient_domain" Noel Jones
  • Re: Ambiguous description on "reject_unknown_recipient_domain" King Cao
• What causes 550 Action not taken ? John Levine
  • Re: What causes 550 Action not taken ? Viktor Dukhovni
• TLS support Kurt Roeckx
  • Re: TLS support Viktor Dukhovni
  • Re: TLS support Patrick Ben Koetter
  • Re: TLS support Corey Quinn
  • Re: TLS support Viktor Dukhovni
  • Re: TLS support Wietse Venema
  • Re: TLS support Patrick Ben Koetter
  • Re: TLS support Viktor Dukhovni
  • Re: TLS support Wietse Venema
  • Re: TLS support Viktor Dukhovni
• X-Original-To via XFORWARD? Patrick Ben Koetter
  • Re: X-Original-To via XFORWARD? Wietse Venema
• Patch: Support NOTIFY ESMTP parameter in SMFIR_ADDRCPT_PAR Andrew Ayer
  • Re: Patch: Support NOTIFY ESMTP parameter in SMFIR_ADDRCPT_PAR Viktor Dukhovni
  • Re: Patch: Support NOTIFY ESMTP parameter in SMFIR_ADDRCPT_PAR Andrew Ayer
  • Re: Patch: Support NOTIFY ESMTP parameter in SMFIR_ADDRCPT_PAR Viktor Dukhovni
  • Re: Patch: Support NOTIFY ESMTP parameter in SMFIR_ADDRCPT_PAR Wietse Venema
  • Re: Patch: Support NOTIFY ESMTP parameter in SMFIR_ADDRCPT_PAR Wietse Venema
• Patch: Expose custom data to postfix map lookups, and call for help Jonathan Hall
  • Re: Patch: Expose custom data to postfix map lookups, and call for help Wietse Venema
• PATCH: Add support in dict_mysql.c for enabling SSL and reading from my.cnf files Gareth Palmer
  • Re: PATCH: Add support in dict_mysql.c for enabling SSL and reading from my.cnf files Wietse Venema
  • Re: PATCH: Add support in dict_mysql.c for enabling SSL and reading from my.cnf files Gareth Palmer
  • Re: PATCH: Add support in dict_mysql.c for enabling SSL and reading from my.cnf files Gareth Palmer
  • Re: PATCH: Add support in dict_mysql.c for enabling SSL and reading from my.cnf files Wietse Venema
• Email Address length check King Cao
  • Re: Email Address length check Rod Dorman
  • Re: Email Address length check Wietse Venema
  • Re: Email Address length check King Cao
• Patch to support multiple destination on transport King Cao
  • Re: Patch to support multiple destination on transport Wietse Venema
  • Re: Patch to support multiple destination on transport King Cao
  • Re: Patch to support multiple destination on transport Wietse Venema
  • Re: Patch to support multiple destination on transport King Cao
  • Re: Patch to support multiple destination on transport Wietse Venema
  • Re: Patch to support multiple destination on transport King Cao
  • Re: Patch to support multiple destination on transport Wietse Venema
  • Re: Patch to support multiple destination on transport King Cao
• limits for slow messages (patch) Patrik Rak
  • Re: limits for slow messages (patch) Patrik Rak
• 'reject_unknown_helo_hostname' shouldn't exist Nikolas Kallis
  • Re: 'reject_unknown_helo_hostname' shouldn't exist hydra
  • Re: 'reject_unknown_helo_hostname' shouldn't exist Martin Barry
  • Re: 'reject_unknown_helo_hostname' shouldn't exist Manuel Bieling
• Bug in Postfix regarding the 'smtpd_helo_required' option Nikolas Kallis
  • Re: Bug in Postfix regarding the 'smtpd_helo_required' option Michael Tokarev
  • Re: Bug in Postfix regarding the 'smtpd_helo_required' option Ralf Hildebrandt
  • Re: Bug in Postfix regarding the 'smtpd_helo_required' option Viktor Dukhovni
• Postfix and 'smtpd_helo_required' Nikolas Kallis
  • Re: Postfix and 'smtpd_helo_required' Viktor Dukhovni
• Separate transport for retried recipients Patrik Rak
  • Re: Separate transport for retried recipients Wietse Venema
  • Re: Separate transport for retried recipients Patrik Rak
  • Re: Separate transport for retried recipients Wietse Venema
  • Re: Separate transport for retried recipients Patrik Rak
  • Re: Separate transport for retried recipients Viktor Dukhovni
  • Re: Separate transport for retried recipients Patrik Rak
  • Re: Separate transport for retried recipients Patrik Rak
  • Re: Separate transport for retried recipients Viktor Dukhovni
  • Re: Separate transport for retried recipients Patrik Rak
  • Re: Separate transport for retried recipients Wietse Venema
  • Re: Separate transport for retried recipients Viktor Dukhovni
  • Re: Separate transport for retried recipients Wietse Venema
  • Re: Separate transport for retried recipients Patrik Rak
  • Re: Separate transport for retried recipients Viktor Dukhovni
  • Re: Separate transport for retried recipients Patrik Rak
  • Re: Separate transport for retried recipients Wietse Venema
  • Re: Separate transport for retried recipients Patrik Rak
  • Re: Separate transport for retried recipients Patrik Rak
  • Re: Separate transport for retried recipients Wietse Venema
  • Re: Separate transport for retried recipients Viktor Dukhovni
  • Re: Separate transport for retried recipients Wietse Venema
  • Re: Separate transport for retried recipients Viktor Dukhovni
  • Re: Separate transport for retried recipients Wietse Venema
  • Re: Separate transport for retried recipients Viktor Dukhovni
  • Re: Separate transport for retried recipients Wietse Venema
  • Re: Separate transport for retried recipients Viktor Dukhovni
  • Re: Separate transport for retried recipients Patrik Rak
  • Re: Separate transport for retried recipients Wietse Venema
  • Re: Separate transport for retried recipients Patrik Rak
  • Re: Separate transport for retried recipients Wietse Venema
  • Re: Separate transport for retried recipients Viktor Dukhovni
  • prescreen (Separate transport for retried recipients) Wietse Venema
  • Re: prescreen (Separate transport for retried recipients) Patrik Rak
  • Re: prescreen (Separate transport for retried recipients) Wietse Venema
  • Re: prescreen (Separate transport for retried recipients) Viktor Dukhovni
  • Re: prescreen (Separate transport for retried recipients) Wietse Venema
  • Re: Separate transport for retried recipients Patrik Rak
  • Re: Separate transport for retried recipients Viktor Dukhovni
  • dynamic process limits (Separate transport for retried recipients) Wietse Venema
  • Re: dynamic process limits (Separate transport for retried recipients) Viktor Dukhovni
  • Re: dynamic process limits (Separate transport for retried recipients) Patrik Rak
  • Re: Separate transport for retried recipients Patrik Rak
  • Re: Separate transport for retried recipients Viktor Dukhovni
  • Re: Separate transport for retried recipients Patrik Rak
  • Re: Separate transport for retried recipients Viktor Dukhovni
  • Re: Separate transport for retried recipients Wietse Venema
  • Re: Separate transport for retried recipients Viktor Dukhovni
  • Re: Separate transport for retried recipients Patrik Rak
  • Re: Separate transport for retried recipients Viktor Dukhovni
  • Re: Separate transport for retried recipients Patrik Rak
  • Re: Separate transport for retried recipients Patrik Rak
  • Re: Separate transport for retried recipients Patrik Rak
  • Re: Separate transport for retried recipients Viktor Dukhovni
  • Re: Separate transport for retried recipients Wietse Venema
  • Re: Separate transport for retried recipients Viktor Dukhovni
  • Re: Separate transport for retried recipients Wietse Venema
  • Re: Separate transport for retried recipients Patrik Rak
  • Re: Separate transport for retried recipients Wietse Venema
  • Re: Separate transport for retried recipients Patrik Rak
  • Re: Separate transport for retried recipients Wietse Venema
  • Re: huge deferred backlog (Separate transport for retried recipients) Patrik Rak
  • Re: huge deferred backlog (Separate transport for retried recipients) Patrik Rak
  • Re: huge deferred backlog (Separate transport for retried recipients) Wietse Venema
  • Re: huge deferred backlog (Separate transport for retried recipients) Patrik Rak
  • Re: huge deferred backlog (Separate transport for retried recipients) Wietse Venema
  • Re: huge deferred backlog (Separate transport for retried recipients) Patrik Rak
  • Re: Separate transport for retried recipients Viktor Dukhovni
  • Re: Separate transport for retried recipients Viktor Dukhovni
  • Re: Separate transport for retried recipients Wietse Venema
  • Re: Separate transport for retried recipients Patrik Rak
  • Re: Separate transport for retried recipients Viktor Dukhovni
  • Re: Separate transport for retried recipients Patrik Rak
• Draft design: Building email archival support into Postfix Wietse Venema
  • Re: Draft design: Building email archival support into Postfix Viktor Dukhovni
  • Re: Draft design: Building email archival support into Postfix Axel Luttgens
  • Re: Draft design: Building email archival support into Postfix Viktor Dukhovni
  • Re: Draft design: Building email archival support into Postfix Patrik Rak
  • Re: Draft design: Building email archival support into Postfix Wietse Venema
  • Re: Draft design: Building email archival support into Postfix Patrik Rak
  • Re: Draft design: Building email archival support into Postfix Wietse Venema
  • Re: Draft design: Building email archival support into Postfix Patrik Rak
  • Re: Draft design: Building email archival support into Postfix Wietse Venema
  • Re: Draft design: Building email archival support into Postfix Viktor Dukhovni
  • Re: Draft design: Building email archival support into Postfix Wietse Venema
  • Re: Draft design: Building email archival support into Postfix Wietse Venema
  • Re: Draft design: Building email archival support into Postfix Viktor Dukhovni
  • Re: Draft design: Building email archival support into Postfix Viktor Dukhovni
  • Re: Draft design: Building email archival support into Postfix Emmanuel Fusté
• PATCH: MacOS X use select() instead of poll() Wietse Venema
  • Re: PATCH: MacOS X use select() instead of poll() Axel Luttgens
  • Re: PATCH: MacOS X use select() instead of poll() Wietse Venema
  • Fwd: PATCH: MacOS X use select() instead of poll() Axel Luttgens
  • Re: Fwd: PATCH: MacOS X use select() instead of poll() Wietse Venema
• MacOS X poll on /dev/random still borked Wietse Venema
  • Re: MacOS X poll on /dev/random still borked Axel Luttgens
  • Re: MacOS X poll on /dev/random still borked Wietse Venema
  • Re: MacOS X poll on /dev/random still borked Axel Luttgens
  • Re: MacOS X poll on /dev/random still borked Wietse Venema
• Postfix 2.10.0, Mac OS X 10.8.3 and kqueue Axel Luttgens
  • Re: Postfix 2.10.0, Mac OS X 10.8.3 and kqueue Wietse Venema
  • Re: Postfix 2.10.0, Mac OS X 10.8.3 and kqueue Axel Luttgens
  • Re: Postfix 2.10.0, Mac OS X 10.8.3 and kqueue Wietse Venema
  • Re: Postfix 2.10.0, Mac OS X 10.8.3 and kqueue Wietse Venema
  • Re: Postfix 2.10.0, Mac OS X 10.8.3 and kqueue Axel Luttgens
  • Re: Postfix 2.10.0, Mac OS X 10.8.3 and kqueue Wietse Venema
  • Re: Postfix 2.10.0, Mac OS X 10.8.3 and kqueue Axel Luttgens
  • Re: Postfix 2.10.0, Mac OS X 10.8.3 and kqueue Wietse Venema
  • Re: Postfix 2.10.0, Mac OS X 10.8.3 and kqueue Axel Luttgens
• Mac OS X and setrlimit(2) Axel Luttgens
  • Re: Mac OS X and setrlimit(2) Wietse Venema
  • Re: Mac OS X and setrlimit(2) Axel Luttgens
  • Re: Mac OS X and setrlimit(2) Wietse Venema
  • Re: Mac OS X and setrlimit(2) Viktor Dukhovni
  • Re: Mac OS X and setrlimit(2) Axel Luttgens
  • Re: Mac OS X and setrlimit(2) Wietse Venema
  • Re: Mac OS X and setrlimit(2) Axel Luttgens
  • PATCH: Mac OS X and setrlimit(2) Wietse Venema
  • Re: PATCH: Mac OS X and setrlimit(2) Viktor Dukhovni
  • Re: PATCH: Mac OS X and setrlimit(2) Wietse Venema
  • Re: PATCH: Mac OS X and setrlimit(2) Axel Luttgens
  • Re: PATCH: Mac OS X and setrlimit(2) Wietse Venema
  • Re: PATCH: Mac OS X and setrlimit(2) Axel Luttgens
  • Re: PATCH: Mac OS X and setrlimit(2) Wietse Venema
  • Re: PATCH: Mac OS X and setrlimit(2) Axel Luttgens

• Earlier messages
• Later messages