It seems to me there is not much interest of mail operators in
stepping to ed25519, reducing the payload of DNS and email?
I know dkimpy supports it (and more -- but is python, uuuh!) for
long, but OpenDKIM is unchanged for eight years.  (At least my
sf.net import from 2017-09-23 still stands.)

Btw i would wonder: why do -- as email operators -- still use DKIM
at all, since there is ARC and it also offers signatures and
verification?  The OpenSSL (-users) ML uses it, and it only.
(dkimpy *can* this.  You know, i am against SPF and dkimpy has the
same author, only due to this i speak pro python!)
Do you take sides in some IETF internal .. whatever it is?
Do you follow the herde?
Haven't you heard anything better?
Do you (have to) sell buzz words?
Is it your operational experience that causes this result?

--steffen
|
|Der Kragenbaer,                The moon bear,
|der holt sich munter           he cheerfully and one by one
|einen nach dem anderen runter  wa.ks himself off
|(By Robert Gernhardt)
_______________________________________________
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org

Reply via email to