On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 06:11:24PM +0200, Melvyn Sopacua wrote:
> > Mailbox files, on the other hand, are usually overwritten, and they
> > are updated in place. This almost works reliably, especially if
> > you use dotlock files and turn off NFS attribute caching.
> >
> And I was talking about OP's case of sharing configuration files. I do a lot
> more with nfs, where multiple machines can write to the same file. As long as
> I do it in sequence, the other ones will see the changes. Two people editing
> the same file falls into shooting yourself in the foot category and is not
> specific to NFS or even two different machines.
It is IMHO much more sensible to push config files from a central machine
where the configs are kept under revision control in CVS, SVN, ... than
to share configs (and indexed tables) via NFS.
--
Viktor.
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the "Reply-To" header.
To unsubscribe from the postfix-users list, visit
http://www.postfix.org/lists.html or click the link below:
<mailto:majord...@postfix.org?body=unsubscribe%20postfix-users>
If my response solves your problem, the best way to thank me is to not
send an "it worked, thanks" follow-up. If you must respond, please put
"It worked, thanks" in the "Subject" so I can delete these quickly.
