On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 12:51 +0200, Magnus Bäck wrote: > On Fri, June 12, 2009 12:12 pm, Steve said: > > > Is this right? > > > > "You cannot whitelist a sender or client in an access list to bypass > > header or body checks. Header and body checks take place whether you > > explicitly "OK" a client or sender, in access lists, or not." > > Yes, that's correct. > Is there any kind of feature request to change this behaviour? Such as allowing a map list of client ip's or ranges that can 'hop over' the header/body checks all together?
If I forward a spam mail to an abuse department quoting full headers (even in the body of the mail) they seem to 'catch' on header rules. I'm not sure if this is a bug/'feature' - but to have to keep commenting out certain rules to get them sent is a minor hassle.
