* Mark Goodge <m...@good-stuff.co.uk>: > I wouldn't call it a bug, since it's a feature that works as designed. > It is, however, a design choice that makes the feature less useful than > it otherwise could have been. But the point here is that content > inspection isn't a core part of the job of an MTA anyway, so if the > rather simplistic version built in to Postfix isn't sufficient then > you're no worse off than if it didn't have the facility to begin with. > The fact that it does it at all is a bonus that may be useful in some > cases where whitelisting isn't necessary.
I only use it for stuff I absolutely don't want to see. Everything else gets handled by amavisd-new > Actually, if you wanted to do it all with Postfix then I think one > solution could be to use multiple SMTP services. Which can be done EASILY using the new postmulti command. Works as documented. I tried :) > Have all inbound mail go to the first service, where mail from > whitelisted sources is handled, then all remaining mail is delivered to > the second service which does header checks before processing the mail. > But there may be other gotchas with this that I haven't thought of. > > Mark -- Ralf Hildebrandt Postfix - Einrichtung, Betrieb und Wartung Tel. +49 (0)30-450 570-155 http://www.computerbeschimpfung.de "FOOT-AND-MOUTH BELIEVED TO BE FIRST VIRUS UNABLE TO SPREAD THROUGH MICROSOFT OUTLOOK Researchers Shocked to Finally Find Virus That Email App Doesn't Like".
