Michael Orlitzky put forth on 12/5/2009 9:03 AM: > I think what you mean to do here is check_client_access (as opposed to > check_recipient_access). You could also use check_helo_access, but then > you'd have to add that machine's HELO hostname to the access map.
The reason for the check_recipient_access everyone is for two spam trap addresses that are intentionally omitted from my post. I did that upon someone's recommendation long ago without realizing the reason for it: first match wins is _per_ restriction class, not across all classes. Thanks for assisting. -- Stan
