mouss put forth on 3/6/2010 6:03 PM: > Stan Hoeppner a écrit : >> [snip] >> A web server with a single IP address hosting 378 vitural domains. Should >> it have 379 PTRs? One for the host itself and one for each virtual domain? >> Of course not. >> >> A mail server with a single IP address hosting 378 mail domains? Should it >> have 379 PTRs? One for the host itself and one for each virtual MX domain? >> Of course not. In this case, the DNS infrastructure isn't smart enough to >> return matching records even though they do exist, so why bother? > > Stan, you're confused. What is "asked" for is:
I'm not confused at all mouss. I was mocking Greg with an absurd example of what he espouses here: Greg A. Woods put forth on 3/6/2010 2:58 PM: > For every hostname pointing at an IP address, there should be a > corresponding PTR for that address pointing back at the hostname. My example exactly matches what he says. What he says is incorrect. I was drawing attention to his absurd suggestion with an example of absurdity. -- Stan
