> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Victor Duchovni > Sent: Monday, January 17, 2011 12:52 AM > On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 05:02:00PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote: > > > > I've been running with "smtpd_tls_eecdh_grade = strong" with > Postfix > > > 2.7 for a while now. No problems to report. Approximately 24,000 > EECDH > > > sessions a week. Of these approximately 75% use AECDH-AES256-SHA, > and ~25% > > > use ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA. > > > > > > Perhaps with 2.9 we can finally "mainstream" server-side eecdh > support. > > > > Assuming that these aren't all Postfix-to-Postfix sessions, that > would > > mean EECDH is burned in by now. > > That's my take. Previous hop mta name comments include: > > - Exim 4.72 #3 > - Websense Email Security (7.3.0)". > - XWall v3.46h > - SonicWALL 7.3.0.4387 > - 8.13.8/8.13.8/SuSE Linux 0.8 > > The diversity is a bit low, but the clients are not exclusively > Postfix.
Do I see it correctly that I'm missing Exchange (or the SMTP included with Microsoft Exchange)? That is the last "bigger" mailserver I know (besides sendmail) that is missing I think. I can probably get a test environment with Microsoft Exchange and with Sendmail to test it if the information might be useful. Regards, Mark
