Thanks Ralf,
That means that the following format should be OK?
ma...@example.com user1,user2,user3
ma...@example.com user1,user2
ma...@example.com user1,user3
This is still a M-to-M mapping (many mail addresses are mapped to many
SASL login usernames), it's just formatted differently.
All the best,
Nick
On 8/2/2011 2:56 μμ, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
That's documented:
In all cases the result of table lookup must be either "not found" or
a list of SASL login names separated by comma and/or whitespace.
