btb:
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
> On 2012.04.09 23.32, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 10:21:05PM -0400, [email protected] wrote:
> >
> >> Given my understanding of address classes, it seemed that in order to use
> >> virtual_alias_maps, those related domains would need to be listed in
> >> virtual_alias_domains.
> >
> > This assumption is incorrect. All recipients, regardless of address
> > class are subject to virtual(5) rewriting.
>
> so the relationship between virtual_alias_maps/virtual_alias_domains is
> not quite the same as the relationship between
> virtual_mailbox_maps/virtual_mailbox_domains or
> relay_recipients/relay_domains?
This is documented in virtual(5).
Wietse
