On 2012.04.10 08.32, Wietse Venema wrote:
so the relationship between virtual_alias_maps/virtual_alias_domains is
not quite the same as the relationship between
virtual_mailbox_maps/virtual_mailbox_domains or
relay_recipients/relay_domains?
This is documented in virtual(5).
thanks for the clarification, i think i understand now. would an
adjustment to ADDRESS_CLASS_README be helpful in highlighting this?
e.g.:
>cat ADDRESS_CLASS_README.patch
--- ADDRESS_CLASS_README 2007-03-25 10:53:46.000000000 -0400
+++ ADDRESS_CLASS_README.mod 2012-04-10 09:20:45.000000000 -0400
@@ -83,6 +83,10 @@
* There is no mail delivery transport parameter. Every address must be
aliased to some other address.
+ * Note: virtual_alias_maps will be used with other address classes unless
+ a given domain is listed in virtual_alias_domains. see the section on
+ VIRTUAL ALIAS DOMAINS in virtual(5) for details.
+
The virtual mailbox domain class.
* Purpose: final delivery for hosted domains where each recipient
address can
-ben
