On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 09:12:57AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> /dev/rob0:
> > > I don't see any PASS OLD in there, so I guess the whitelist
> > > did the trick? Would anything else be logged?
> >
> > Hmm, I'm not sure what that was; maybe 66.220.144.151 was due
> > for retesting in some tests? Here are some from a bit later,
> > which get "PASS NEW" without any after-220 tests:
>
> It may well be that PASS OLD logging has broken.
Not entirely, as I do have numerous PASS OLD in the logs:
$ egrep "^May 13 .* PASS OLD" /var/log/maillog | wc
73 584 5947
(Less 12 from before the upgrade at ~01:00 UTC.) Would it be useful
to see some of those? I suppose they're meaningless without the
whitelist database showing when the various tests were passed.
> I spent most development time looking at verbose output to
> verify that postscreen makes the right decisions. I'll check
> out the logging next.
I'll be ready to try another snapshot when available. :)
--
http://rob0.nodns4.us/ -- system administration and consulting
Offlist GMX mail is seen only if "/dev/rob0" is in the Subject:
