b...@bitrate.net wrote: >On Aug 16, 2013, at 01.56, Rob Tanner <rtan...@linfield.edu> wrote: > >> What is it, besides adding the correct the DNS TXT records > >as there is a formal dns rr type for spf defined in rfc4408, you'll of >course want to include that as well.
I wouldn't bother. It has only very limited deployment and is proposed for removal in the revision to RFC 4408 that is about to enter IETF last call. The is, however, unrelated to postfix. Either spf-discuss or spf-help would be appropriate. See www.openspf.org/Forums for information about these lists. Scott K
