Wietse Venema <wietse <at> porcupine.org> writes: > > Wietse Venema: > > Would it be possible to describe the problem that you are trying > > to solve, instead of your solution (routing <> senders differently). > > It is an uncommon requirement. Arbitrary routing requires a procedural > > language, which is currently not included with Postfix. > > Your original solution was about rewriting instead of routing, but > apart from that, same limitation applies. > > Wietse > >
With my "original solution", do you mean the access table with REDIRECT directive? It's the first thing I came up with, but I changed my mind quite rapidly because of its poorness in dealing with multiple recipients.
