On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 06:51:06AM +0000, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > [ Please refrain from jumping at every opportunity to contradict > someone. If you haven't taken the time to understand the complete > context, give it a pass. A larger fraction of your responses on > this list should be helpful rather than merely contrarian. ]
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 09:08:12AM +0200, [email protected] wrote: > > This should not be adhered to pedantically. Used properly RPATH > > (or now RUNPATH) is necessary and useful. The Postfix executables > > will use an RPATH that is not found among the standard system > > library directories > > as long they are found by remove the rpath with the snippet below > that's not a problem, in case of RPM packages there are never > libraries from an older release at the time the service is started > > [...] I repeat: [ Please refrain from jumping at every opportunity to contradict someone. If you haven't taken the time to understand the complete context, give it a pass. A larger fraction of your responses on this list should be helpful rather than merely contrarian. ] -- Viktor.
