Am 10.07.2014 10:56, schrieb Viktor Dukhovni: > On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 06:51:06AM +0000, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > >> [ Please refrain from jumping at every opportunity to contradict >> someone. If you haven't taken the time to understand the complete >> context, give it a pass. A larger fraction of your responses on >> this list should be helpful rather than merely contrarian. ] > > On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 09:08:12AM +0200, [email protected] wrote: > >>> This should not be adhered to pedantically. Used properly RPATH >>> (or now RUNPATH) is necessary and useful. The Postfix executables >>> will use an RPATH that is not found among the standard system >>> library directories >> >> as long they are found by remove the rpath with the snippet below >> that's not a problem, in case of RPM packages there are never >> libraries from an older release at the time the service is started >> >> [...] > > I repeat: > > [ Please refrain from jumping at every opportunity to contradict > someone. If you haven't taken the time to understand the complete > context, give it a pass. A larger fraction of your responses on > this list should be helpful rather than merely contrarian. ]
sorry for care about packagers and thank you for strip the relevant parts from your quote - man you have a bad day
