> Am 18.01.2015 um 23:27 schrieb m...@ruggedinbox.com: > > Return-Path: <vm...@ruggedinbox.com> > Delivered-To: m...@ruggedinbox.com > Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) > by ruggedinbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7693331405C7 > for <m...@ruggedinbox.com>; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 23:23:03 +0100 (CET)
At this stage, the Return-Path is already included through the amavisd filter (Postfix smtpd_proxy_filter…). See below. It’s a while ago that I used proxy. Is it right that amavisd sends mail back over port 10024? (I use milters since decades) > X-Spam-Flag: NO > X-Spam-Score: -0.002 > X-Spam-Level: > X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.002 required=5 tests=[NO_RECEIVED=-0.001, > NO_RELAYS=-0.001] autolearn=no > Received: from ruggedinbox.com ([127.0.0.1]) > by localhost (ruggedinbox.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) > with ESMTP id y_8qU3bCUyh9 for <m...@ruggedinbox.com>; > Sun, 18 Jan 2015 23:23:01 +0100 (CET) It seems your test mail goes through amavisd, right? Not a milter. You are using proxy as described above? So I guess your Return-Path is added here, not later. > Mime-Version: 1.0 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; > format=flowed > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 22:23:01 +0000 > From: m...@ruggedinbox.com > To: m...@ruggedinbox.com > Subject: test3 > Message-ID: <4cbb98dd59ce89a54078d25049815...@ruggedinbox.com> > X-Sender: m...@ruggedinbox.com Just what I guess… Christian -- Bachelor of Science Informatik Erlenwiese 14, 36304 Alsfeld T: +49 6631 78823400, F: +49 6631 78823409, M: +49 171 9905345 USt-IdNr.: DE225643613, http://www.roessner-network-solutions.com
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
