Am 28.01.2015 um 19:44 schrieb Орхан Ибад-оглы Гасымов:
Thanks for your reply.
1. "...this is the wrong list" - disagree: if the result comes from
interaction of two pieces of software (in this case, Postfix and DSPAM),
either list could be considered relevant. Following this idea, I've
emailed my question to DSPAM mailing list too.
on the dspam list are for sure more people using dspam as here and more
imprtant they likely recommend things better suited for having both
pieces working together instead only look on the postfix side
2. "...dspam is abandonware" - thanks for an interesting piece of
information.
it's asd, last year i considered to use it myself before change the
decision to SpamAssassin+ClamAv+Postscreen+PTR/HELO-filters
3. "...without provide configuration is ridiculous" - of course. I just
wanted to start the conversation with a short message (long messages
sometimes scare people); I'll provide all relevant configs tomorrow when
I'm at work.
the people scared by technical context can't help anyways :-)
the others are missing their crystal ball most of the time :-)
2015-01-28 22:26 GMT+04:00 li...@rhsoft.net <mailto:li...@rhsoft.net>
<li...@rhsoft.net <mailto:li...@rhsoft.net>>:
Am 28.01.2015 um 19:04 schrieb Орхан Ибад-оглы Гасымов:
Trying to add DSPAM to my Postfix - Dovecot setup, I came across an
interesting situation, maybe someone here had a similar problem
before?
Here's what happens:
Only local mail (i.e. letters sent from one mailbox to another
mailbox
on my server) is passed through DSPAM. Emails from other servers are
received, but no DSPAM headers are inserted in them. And
"dspam_stats"
command shows no hits in the second case, while there are hits
for the
local mail.
Did anyone had this type of misconfiguration before? Your help
would be
highly appreciated!
besides that this is the wrong list and dspam is abandonware
(http://comments.gmane.org/__gmane.mail.spam.dspam.user/__19136
<http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.spam.dspam.user/19136>) asking
for a type of misconfiguration without provide configuration is
ridiculous
http://www.catb.org/esr/faqs/__smart-questions.html#beprecise
<http://www.catb.org/esr/faqs/smart-questions.html#beprecise>
