On Mon Dec 03 2018 04:27:43 Matus UHLAR - fantomas      <uh...@fantomas.sk> 
said:
pleaase, get a decent MUA, not applemail that tries to encode everything as
internet links (and messes up thge plaintext version of mail).

On Dec 6, 2018, at 3:00 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uh...@fantomas.sk> wrote:
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.102.3)

On 06.12.18 07:56, Larry Stone wrote:
That does not appear to be the standard Apple Mail.  I am running MacOS
10.14.1 (the latest until 10.14.2 was released yesterday) and I have
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.1 \(3445.101.1\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.101.1)

while jlbr...@bordo.com.au has
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.2 \(3445.102.3\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.102.3)

I see @lbutlr has the same version:

X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.102.3)

although no Mime-Version: header.

It’s possible that’s a new version included with 10.14.2 but Mr.  Brown
sent his message four days ago and 10.14.2 was released yesterday (he
might have been running a pre-release version).  It’s possible that
however he pasted that into his message did that.  It’s also possible that
something downline of Mr.  Brown at bordo.com.au is changing the message,
converting it to multi-part, and adding that crap.  I do note in the
headers of his message that there are a bunch related to an anti-spam
product called ASSP.  I’ve never heard of it before and have no idea if it
has that capability.

X-Assp-Version: 2.6.2(18328) on mail.bordo.com.au
X-Assp-ID: mail.bordo.com.au id-00682-15042
X-Assp-Session: 7FB04622FB68 (mail 1)
X-Assp-Envelope-From: jlbr...@bordo.com.au
X-Assp-Intended-For: postfix-users@postfix.org
X-Assp-Client-SSL: yes
X-Assp-Server-TLS: yes

In any event, unless I’m missing it, the version I and most everyone else
has of Apple Mail does not do that.  I’ve sent a test message to myself
with HTML included and there was no conversion of links.  And this message
was sent with Apple Mail.

This and @lbutlr mail were plaintext-only. Maybe multipart mail has them 
encoded in plaintext versions?

Anyway, sorry for the noise.

however, my questions weren't responded and still apply:

Are those cf files properly configured? Can postfix connect to the database?
What's in the logs?

and also the comment:

Not sure where I’ve gone wrong. Copied most config details across from my 
working (older) mail server.

often not a good idea, your postfix config file has too many options where I
believe many could be left default.

--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Christian Science Programming: "Let God Debug It!".

Reply via email to