On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Bborie Park <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 4:00 PM, David Rowley <[email protected]>wrote: > > So I guess the problem is void since it's been fixed in the latest minor > version. I've not looked at the postgis source, but I did notice that the > Gdal version went from 1.9.2 to 1.10.0 since 2.0.3. Perhaps the problem > could be there... > > David > > No, the problem wouldn't have anything to do with GDAL as ST_Union doesn't > use it. I'm betting it has to do with how exceptions are handled... > > http://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/ticket/2375 > > Did this change between 2.0.3 and 2.0.4? Though I guess there's not much that can be done if it is fixed in 2.0.4 apart from push windows users harder to upgrade. I just emailed my hosting company to ask them if they would move me up to 2.0.4, but I guess if that is the problem then it won't have an affect since it's not windows. David -bborie > > > _______________________________________________ > postgis-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users > >
_______________________________________________ postgis-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users
