Why can't you support 10 in 9.6? If people install 10 in 9.6, they can then pg_upgrade to 10.
I'm hesitant to support 10 in 2.3 because that would mean we have to support it for the life of 10 and I already made enough changes in 2.4 for 10 that it leaves me a bit hesitant to risk back-porting those changes to 2.3. Thanks, Regina -----Original Message----- From: postgis-users [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Devrim Gündüz Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2017 5:57 PM To: PostGIS Users Discussion <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [postgis-users] Postgis version for v10 Hi, On Tue, 2017-07-25 at 13:09 -0400, Regina Obe wrote: > If we decide 2.4 is not ready by end August (and it seems 10 will be > released in Sept as planned), then we'll patch 2.3 to support 10. We > are going to try to avoid that though. As I wrote yesterday in a separate thread, we *have to* support 10 in 2.3, otherwise pg_upgrade will fail. FWIW, the PostGIS RPMs are shipped with the .so file of X-1 major version to support upgrades, so I expect 2.3 to be compiled against 10. BTW, as the packager, I really would prefer to have an *official* alpha/beta nowadays, as we are about to release PostgreSQL 10 beta3, and did not test PostGIS RPMS yet. Thanks! Regards, -- Devrim G nd z EnterpriseDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com PostgreSQL Danismani/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer Twitter: @DevrimGunduz , @DevrimGunduzTR _______________________________________________ postgis-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users
