Why do you think loading is a heavy duty?
On Tuesday, 20 August 2019, Basques, Bob (CI-StPaul) < bob.basq...@ci.stpaul.mn.us> wrote: > All, > > One biggie, is that the ESRI side does not like connecting to the > “postgres” named database, claiming it’s a System database (whatever that > means). This is not readily available as a limitation either when looking > for reasons why it won’t connect. We’ve been using the “postgres” database > name for years (a decade now??) with no ill effects from other > applications/ connections. I sort of understand this from the commercial > side having worked with other databases like Oracle and MSSQL, but still, > there should be a way to side step this with a setting somewhere. > > I looked high and low for a way to alias the “postgres” database name > inside of Postgres, but didn’t find anything very easy to implement or > maintain very easily. I did think about setting up another dataabase and > using Views to the postgres database, but that seemed like a bad idea for > some reason, along with being somewhat hard to maintain, but upon > reflection I keep coming back to the idea. > > All non “postgres” named connections seem to work fine so far. Haven’t > implemented anything yet that is really heavy duty as far as loading > though, so who knows. > > Anyway, just my 2cents. > > bobb > > > > On Aug 20, 2019, at 10:12 AM, Shaozhong SHI <shishaozh...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > *Think Before You Click: *This email originated *outside *our > organization. > > How to ensure that all versions of ArcGIS desktop applications can access > and read from server-based PostGIS/PostgreSQL? > > Regards, > > Shao > _______________________________________________ > postgis-users mailing list > postgis-users@lists.osgeo.org > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users > > >
_______________________________________________ postgis-users mailing list postgis-users@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users
