Shao,

I’ve been able to overload a ESRI server in the past (on multiple occasions) by 
assuming the ESRI services can keep up with the same types of calls that I’ve 
used for Open Source based services.   I’m sure that the services can be 
configured to handle these types of requests, but it usually is non-typical 
coniguration or ends up costing more money for an additional module.

Anyway, I haven’t tried running a service connection to postgres from the ESRI 
side in any sort of high load configuration yet.  Mostly because I’m not the 
service admin.

bobb


On Aug 20, 2019, at 3:36 PM, Shaozhong SHI 
<shishaozh...@gmail.com<mailto:shishaozh...@gmail.com>> wrote:

Think Before You Click: This email originated outside our organization.

Why do you think loading is a heavy duty?


On Tuesday, 20 August 2019, Basques, Bob (CI-StPaul) 
<bob.basq...@ci.stpaul.mn.us<mailto:bob.basq...@ci.stpaul.mn.us>> wrote:
All,

One biggie, is that the ESRI side does not like connecting to the “postgres” 
named database, claiming it’s a System database (whatever that means).  This is 
not readily available as a limitation either when looking for reasons why it 
won’t connect.  We’ve been using the “postgres” database name for years (a 
decade now??) with no ill effects from other applications/ connections.  I sort 
of understand this from the commercial side having worked with other databases 
like Oracle and MSSQL, but still, there should be a way to side step this with 
a setting somewhere.

I looked high and low for a way to alias the “postgres” database name inside of 
Postgres, but didn’t find anything very easy to implement or maintain very 
easily.  I did think about setting up another dataabase and using Views to the 
postgres database, but that seemed like a bad idea for some reason, along with 
being somewhat hard to maintain, but upon reflection I keep coming back to the 
idea.

All non “postgres” named connections seem to work fine so far.  Haven’t 
implemented anything yet that is really heavy duty as far as loading though, so 
who knows.

Anyway, just my 2cents.

bobb



On Aug 20, 2019, at 10:12 AM, Shaozhong SHI 
<shishaozh...@gmail.com<mailto:shishaozh...@gmail.com>> wrote:

Think Before You Click: This email originated outside our organization.

How to ensure that all versions of ArcGIS desktop applications can access and 
read from server-based PostGIS/PostgreSQL?

Regards,

Shao
_______________________________________________
postgis-users mailing list
postgis-users@lists.osgeo.org<mailto:postgis-users@lists.osgeo.org>
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users

_______________________________________________
postgis-users mailing list
postgis-users@lists.osgeo.org<mailto:postgis-users@lists.osgeo.org>
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users

_______________________________________________
postgis-users mailing list
postgis-users@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users

Reply via email to