On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 05:06:20PM +0100, Jose Carlos Martinez wrote: > Ok, I understand the strictness but what makes me confused if the > mixed policy about standards. > > For example: > PostGIS 1.5 -> ST_StartPoint and ST_Endoints with Multi types are > working (against SQL/MM) > PostGIS 2.0 -> ST_StartPoint and ST_Endoints with Multi types return > null (folllow SQL/MM) > > PostGIS 1.5 -> ST_GeometryN (geom, 1) with simple types returns null > (folllow SQL/MM) > PostGIS 2.0 -> ST_GeometryN (geom, 1) with simple types are working > (against SQL/MM) > > In some cases it follows the standards but in other cases it follows > the usability.
It all started with 'ST_' enforcement. Before that, we could be silly with 'ST_' names and smart w/out. I guess nowadays it's not that worth being silly to follow the standard ... File tickets and fight for them ! --strk; () Free GIS & Flash consultant/developer /\ http://strk.keybit.net/services.html _______________________________________________ postgis-users mailing list [email protected] http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users
