On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 02:17:30PM -0800, Paul Ramsey wrote: > On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 1:39 PM, Sandro Santilli <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I guess nowadays it's not that worth being silly to follow > > the standard ... > > Right, non-brain-dead behavior should be our default. Silly that we > have st_npoints that works and st_numpoints that doesn't.
Indeed. It was clearer when one of the two didn't have the 'st_' prefix. You could tell the broken one was the other... --strk; () Free GIS & Flash consultant/developer /\ http://strk.keybit.net/services.html _______________________________________________ postgis-users mailing list [email protected] http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users
