Definitely use local-time. The integration worked well, back in 2007, and neither library has changed very much since then, so I think you can feel safe that they are in good shape (others are using them as well).
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 3:55 PM, Eli Naeher <enae...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I'm working on moving an existing application to Postmodern, and I'm trying > to decide whether to go with simple-date or local-time. Currently all dates > are stored as "timestamp without time zone," but we are hoping to move > toward a timezone-aware model at some point down the road (although not > immediately--it might end up being a couple years). > > For this reason I'm considering using local-time instead of simple-date. > Times and dates are a big part of the application so I'd like to get this > right. I notice that the local-time cl-postgres integration has not had any > commits in a few years. I'm hoping this is because it is stable and > complete. Is anyone using it? > > Thank you, > -Eli
