Thank you--it's helpful to hear that. -Eli
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Marijn Haverbeke <mari...@gmail.com> wrote: > Definitely use local-time. The integration worked well, back in 2007, > and neither library has changed very much since then, so I think you > can feel safe that they are in good shape (others are using them as > well). > > On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 3:55 PM, Eli Naeher <enae...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I'm working on moving an existing application to Postmodern, and I'm > trying > > to decide whether to go with simple-date or local-time. Currently all > dates > > are stored as "timestamp without time zone," but we are hoping to move > > toward a timezone-aware model at some point down the road (although not > > immediately--it might end up being a couple years). > > > > For this reason I'm considering using local-time instead of simple-date. > > Times and dates are a big part of the application so I'd like to get this > > right. I notice that the local-time cl-postgres integration has not had > any > > commits in a few years. I'm hoping this is because it is stable and > > complete. Is anyone using it? > > > > Thank you, > > -Eli >
