Hi!
Steve Bennett-3 wrote: > > My feeling is that "proposed" is really not a type of highway, and > that eventually this tagging scheme will be replaced by something a > little less idiosyncratic: > > highway=tertiary > lifecycle=proposed > That is exactly the one thing we must avoid. Because all existing renderers, maps and tools will interpret it as: highway=tertiary => Rendered as a regular highway lifecycle=proposed => unknown tag, ignored On the other hand: At least highway=construction is already established and works very vell. So don't break it. On another point: The cleanup of additional tags after a change to the "main" tag is a general problem. A solution would be nice, but it is neither limited to this use case nor to Potlatch. E.g. when you switch a highway=track, tracktype=grade2 to a highway=unclassified with the presets in JOSM, the tracktype will remain and cause erroneous renderings in various maps. bye Nop -- View this message in context: http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/Potlatch-dev-Suggestion-for-lifecycle-tag-comments-tp6029585p6030977.html Sent from the Potlatch mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Potlatch-dev mailing list Potlatch-dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/potlatch-dev