Andy Allan wrote: > Pretty unnecessary, imo. I think you're misunderstanding the > current purpose of the "simple" tab - providing a simple UI for > the majority of the mapping. Proposed buildings is pretty niche, > and should be incorporated in a way becoming of its niche-ness.
+1. (Are we allowed to say <aol>me too</aol> these days in view of our generous sponsors...?) Potlatch, 1 or 2, has always been a 90-10 editor. Make the 90% of mapping easy, and the 10% possible. And of course the 'advanced' view makes anything possible. We have the luxury that JOSM exists for those who want to do the hardcore 10%, 5%, often even 0.1%. But we also have the responsibility that, as the default and OSM-hosted editor, Potlatch needs to be approachable and understandable. I'm also a little aware (having optimised the CategorySelector stuff yesterday) that the tagging code is way complicated as it is and probably doesn't need any more edge cases lest my head explode. ;) cheers Richard -- View this message in context: http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/Potlatch-dev-Suggestion-for-lifecycle-tag-comments-tp6029585p6031319.html Sent from the Potlatch mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Potlatch-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/potlatch-dev
